← Search

Karina Frid

San Francisco, CA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
51 matches · 38W–13L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Karina Frid to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history51 matches
W
2026-06-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Emily Huang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-13 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Clare Donahue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-05-10 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tiffany Loh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-04-16 · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
Lysbet Verlenden / Charito Aquino
2025-11-02 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ann Zabat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
Catherine Krabbenschmidt / Schuyler Tilney-Volk
2025-10-08 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Simone Jensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
Lizzie Siegle / Maylen Yue
2025-09-20 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Abbey Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
W
La Phengrasamy / Jennifer Wang
2025-09-05 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lily Tan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
Kayla Emmerson / Brook Hartzell
2025-09-04 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Michelle Yang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2025-06-27 · #2 Doubles · with Abbey Moore championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
Caitlin Beatty / Lisa Lohre
2025-06-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Abbey Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
Seema Moorjani
2025-06-04 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2017–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
78.9%
15W–4L · 62.2% of games
4.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 55.2% of games
8.5
60%
3W–2L · 56.5% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 47.6% of games
8.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 65.1% of games
9.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
8 matches
#1 Singles
12%
6 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova