← Search

Cheryl Tolentino

Apopka, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
92 matches · 40W–52L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Cheryl Tolentino to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history92 matches
L
2026-09-13 · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kathleen Sipio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-09-13 · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kathleen Sipio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7
L
2026-05-22 · Waterford Lakes-Driggers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Sipio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-05-15 · Waterford Lakes-Driggers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Konicki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
Michelle Ford / ROSANA MONTEIRO
2026-05-11 · USTA Campus-Sipio · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Sipio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-24 · Waterford Lakes-Driggers · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Victoria Karen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-17 · Waterford Lakes-Driggers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Sipio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-04-15 · USTA Campus-Sipio · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vanha Le
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-02 · USTA Campus-Sipio · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Sipio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-02-09 · USTA Campus-Sipio · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vanha Le
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-01-30 · Waterford-Driggers Slice Girls · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Victoria Karen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-12 · USTA Campus-Sipio · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Sipio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
60%
3W–2L · 59.1% of games
2.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
44.4%
24W–30L · 49.3% of games
4.0
0%
0W–6L · 29% of games
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 49.4% of games
7.5
25%
2W–6L · 45.2% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
18 matches
#1 Singles
12%
11 matches
#3 Female Doubles
3%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert