← Search

H Kim Duong

Torrance, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
39 matches · 31W–8L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add H Kim Duong to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history39 matches
W
2026-08-29 · BC-SBTC/YolandaBarocio8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kangsung Yip mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-02 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Terumi Barrett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-03 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Beverly Johnston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-03-21 · BC-ElDoradoPark/YolandaBarocio · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mike Vieane mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-02-01 · BC-ElDoradoPark/YolandaBarocio · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mike Vieane mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
W
2025-06-22 · BC-AltaVista/RudemaardOdanaka · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristen Reut
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-04-13 · BC-AltaVista/RudemaardOdanaka · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Abbigail Fietzer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2025-03-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Pila
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
Virginia Knebel / Venita McLay
2025-02-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chiaki Maeda
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
Christine Stephens / Angela Dax
2024-11-24 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Pila
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2024-11-03 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Pila
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2024-09-15 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Pila
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
81.8%
18W–4L · 63.7% of games
8.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 75% of games
8.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 55.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
6 matches
#2 Singles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer