← Search

Amy Newhall

South Pasadena, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
181 matches · 126W–55L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Amy Newhall to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history181 matches
L
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kasia Chmielewski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
Stephanie Smith
2026-06-27 · SGV Live Oaks Ladies-Perry-Live Oaks/SA1 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Melissa Mazin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-5
L
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stephanie Perry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-30 · SGV Live Oaks Ladies-Perry-Live Oaks/SA1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christyne Burdett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-17 · SGV Live Oaks Ladies-Perry-Live Oaks/SA1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Messana
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · SGV Live Oaks Ladies-Perry-Live Oaks/SA1 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-04-25 · SGV Live Oaks Ladies-Perry-Live Oaks/SA1 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-03-22 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Messana
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-03-14 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-03-07 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-22 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Messana
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
74.8%
92W–31L · 60.9% of games
4.5
53.8%
7W–6L · 54.7% of games
8.0
59.4%
19W–13L · 59.2% of games
4.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 38% of the time
#1 Singles
38%
69 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
20 matches
#2 Singles
8%
14 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer