← Search

Chad Boyd

FARMINGTON, CT
4.0C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
58 matches · 53W–5L · seasons 2020–2023

Captains: add Chad Boyd to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history58 matches
W
Kendall Lin
2023-09-05 · LEBTC RED · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
James Hull / William Bonthron
2023-08-22 · LEBTC RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brandon Dumler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
Sam Pope / ELIZABETH SKLAROFF
2023-08-20 · LEBTC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shari Newton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2023-08-08 · LEBTC RED · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
Sandy McGregor / Shane McGregor
2023-08-06 · LEBTC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shari Newton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Ben Henry
2023-07-25 · LEBTC RED · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
Randy Lazzell / Helen Lazzell
2023-07-23 · LEBTC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shari Newton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
Ronald Rhinehart / Sadras Senthilvel
2023-07-19 · LEBTC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Arin Neucks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
Kirstin Kraig / Greg Fisher
2023-07-16 · LEBTC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Christina Schwartz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2023-07-12 · LEBTC GREEN · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brandon Dumler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
Marcus McAskin / Jim Renshaw
2023-07-05 · LEBTC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Richard Selim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
Peter Ludwig / James Sigman
2023-06-28 · LEBTC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brady Freestone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2020–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
100%
17W–0L · 72.8% of games
4.0
84.6%
11W–2L · 60.4% of games
7.0mixed
100%
8W–0L · 66.9% of games
7.5mixed
100%
8W–0L · 65.5% of games
8.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 64.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
12 matches
#1 Singles
10%
6 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer