← Search

Lisa Warrum

— year-end
72 matches · 29W–43L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lisa Warrum to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history72 matches
L
Ruth Sorensen / Aimee Durm
2026-07-24 · Indy A40 3.0W HawGCC Senseman · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cindy Senseman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-09 · Indy A40 3.0W HawGCC Senseman · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cindy Senseman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-18 · Indy A55 7.0W E IRCD Akers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Heidi Yates
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-11 · Indy A55 7.0W E IRCD Akers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Heidi Yates
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-04 · Indy A55 7.0W E IRCD Akers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Turpen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
Brandon Noel / Donna Laird
2026-04-17 · Indy X40 7.0 IHP Poe · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dennis Poe mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-5
L
Melody Gierbolini / Melissa Patterson
2025-10-30 · CIN A40 3.0W IND Senseman · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Natalie Scheidler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-10-03 · CIN A40 3.0W IND Senseman · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with M Shannon Heider
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-07-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Natalie Scheidler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
Aimee Durm / Robyn Gibboney
2025-07-10 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tina Rhoades
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-5
L
2025-07-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Natalie Scheidler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
Kathy Collins / Ann Vail
2025-06-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Nevitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Teams8 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
40%
2W–3L · 35.8% of games
3.0
34%
18W–35L · 43.1% of games
3.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 50.5% of games
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 50% of the time
#2 Doubles
50%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
4 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams