← Search

Meredith Everett

— year-end
33 matches · 15W–18L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Meredith Everett to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history33 matches
L
2026-08-28 · RKartes/JGrahl (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Holly Disser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-03 · KEggers (Raintree) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katie Sarjeant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-25 · KEggers (Raintree) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mindy Zimmerman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-06-05 · KEggers (Raintree) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Meagan Dorst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-29 · KEggers (Raintree) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bonnie Sheppard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-04-17 · RKartes/LClancy (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lauren Mulcahy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-10 · RKartes/LClancy (Queens) · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-13 · RKartes/LClancy (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cynthia Nicholson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-06 · RKartes/LClancy (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Meritt Schoening
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-09-19 · JGrahl/RKartes (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Elizabeth Golden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-09-05 · JGrahl/RKartes (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lisa Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
W
2025-08-26 · JGrahl/RKartes (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Laura Clancy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Teams16 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
25%
1W–3L · 42.2% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 59.9% of games
4.5
25%
1W–3L · 36.2% of games
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 59.4% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 47.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
7 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal