← Search

Linda Carlson

— year-end
101 matches · 29W–72L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Linda Carlson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history101 matches
W
2026-08-24 · LCTA18/Miller/Hamlin · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Miki Waring
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-08-19 · LCTA40/Waring/Hamlin · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kathy Cavaco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-10 · LCTA18/Miller/Hamlin · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Christina Finn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-07-29 · LCTA40/Waring/Hamlin · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Mary Lowe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-24 · LCTA55/Dever/MPR · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michele Mayer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-17 · LCTA55/Dever/MPR · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nickole Branch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-15 · LCTA40/Waring/Hamlin · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Mary Lowe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-06 · LCTA18/Miller/Hamlin · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Mary Lowe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-03-26 · LCTA40/Harris/Hamlin · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sandra Trambow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-5
L
2026-03-23 · LCTA55/Waring/Hamlin · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Hancock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-13 · LCTA55/Waring/Hamlin · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deena Hofstetter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-12 · LCTA40/Harris/Hamlin · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sandra Trambow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
Teams30 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 55.8% of games
3.0
23.5%
16W–52L · 39.4% of games
5.5
44.4%
8W–10L · 47.4% of games
6.5
0%
0W–7L · 30.2% of games
3.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
39 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
28 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova