← Search

Bobbi Kearney

Eugene, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
165 matches · 100W–65L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Bobbi Kearney to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history165 matches
W
2026-07-26 · #2 Doubles · with Jesse Aguero championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-26 · #2 Doubles · with Jesse Aguero championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-25 · SOR-ESTC-Kearney/Jordan · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-25 · SOR-ESTC-Kearney/Jordan · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Don Hakala mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-24 · SOR-ESTC-Kearney/Jordan · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-10 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aubree Nash
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aubree Nash
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aubree Nash
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aubree Nash
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aubree Nash
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-01 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aubree Nash
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-04-19 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aubree Nash
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2018–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
94.1%
16W–1L · 71.5% of games
3.5
83.9%
26W–5L · 62.1% of games
4.0
64.7%
22W–12L · 54% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 60.7% of games
7.0mixed
46.2%
12W–14L · 49.1% of games
8.0mixed
47.4%
9W–10L · 51.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
85 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
38 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams