← Search

Adrienne Garstang

Kansas City, MO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
53 matches · 16W–37L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Adrienne Garstang to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history53 matches
L
2026-06-11 · Garstang, Adrienne · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-05 · Garstang, Adrienne · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-28 · Garstang, Adrienne · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
Andrea Erickson
2026-05-21 · Garstang, Adrienne · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-14 · Garstang, Adrienne · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-07 · Garstang, Adrienne · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathleen Savaiano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-23 · Garstang, Adrienne · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carolyn Arnold
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-04-16 · Garstang, Adrienne · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-15 · Gerleman, Sarah · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cheryl Morton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-02-15 · Gerleman, Sarah · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cheryl Morton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-02-04 · Gerleman, Sarah · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Noll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-12-07 · Gerleman, Sarah · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn Arnold
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 43.6% of games
3.5
32.4%
12W–25L · 44% of games
7.0mixed
12.5%
1W–7L · 47.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
10 matches
#1 Singles
17%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
7 matches
#2 Singles
9%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova