← Search

Eveline Shum

Washington, DC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
133 matches · 46W–87L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Eveline Shum to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history133 matches
L
2026-07-13 · Racqueteers 3.0 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-5
L
2026-07-12 · Racqueteers 3.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deborah Moss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-21 · Racqueteers 3.0 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-21 · Racqueteers 3.0 · #3 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-19 · Racqueteers 3.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tracie Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-07 · Racqueteers 3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Sharma
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-30 · Racqueteers 3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sara Tee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-09 · Racqueteers 3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrea Torres
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-05-09 · Sharma - Ace Ace Baby · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-03 · Racqueteers 3.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Sharma
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-2
W
2026-04-18 · Racqueteers 3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tracie Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-04-03 · Racqueteers 3.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Eva Habash
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 56.1% of games
3.0
31.2%
24W–53L · 43.4% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
26.7%
4W–11L · 41.2% of games
6.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 35.5% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 56.9% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 14.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
44 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
28 matches
#3 Singles
7%
9 matches
#1 Singles
5%
7 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert