← Search

Cassie Lucks

New Albany, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
266 matches · 141W–125L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Cassie Lucks to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history266 matches
L
2026-07-02 · NACC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chelsea Dreven
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-27 · New Albany · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cheri Lehmann
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
Susan Denny / Michelle Robinson
2026-04-24 · Scarborough 1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan Kreitzer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
Jennifer Mihalich / Claire Feit
2026-03-29 · New Albany 1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carmela Meade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-13 · Scarborough 1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shannon Girardi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-03-09 · New Albany · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jessica Byers
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-5
W
2026-03-08 · New Albany 1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shannon Girardi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-03-06 · Scarborough 1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shannon Girardi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-03-02 · New Albany · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Heather Hunter
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-4
L
2026-02-22 · New Albany 1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shannon Girardi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-02-20 · Scarborough 1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shannon Girardi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
Lily Duan / Cindy Smith
2026-02-15 · New Albany 1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shannon Girardi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
61.1%
22W–14L · 54.7% of games
3.5
62%
44W–27L · 53.3% of games
4.0
44.5%
53W–66L · 47.1% of games
6.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 71.1% of games
7.5
50%
13W–13L · 49.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
149 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
70 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
37 matches
#2 Singles
3%
8 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe