← Search

Alexis Robison

Phoenix, AZ
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
259 matches · 203W–56L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Alexis Robison to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history259 matches
W
Chrystelle Musquin / Kenneth Hotchkiss
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Joel Robison mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
Anne Inda / Albert Tsang
2026-07-28 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chad Harrison mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
Chrystelle Musquin / Wally Murray
2026-07-26 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with David Heldt-Werle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
CAREY Corfield / Tomoatsu Kato
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Christopher Jazwa mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-21 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chad Harrison mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 2-6, 1-0
W
Dawn Allen / Ford Corl
2026-06-21 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Walter Martin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
Jaime Tibaduiza / Samantha Garlock
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chad Harrison mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Holly Tappan / Kathleen Stevens
2026-06-13 · TAHOE DONNER 18AW4.5A · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Maggie Sekul
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-07 · TAHOE DONNER 18AW4.5A · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Maggie Sekul
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-06-06 · TAHOE DONNER 18AW4.5A · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Maggie Sekul
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-30 · TAHOE DONNER 18AW4.5A · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Annie Wang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
90.9%
10W–1L · 77.6% of games
4.0
89.2%
99W–12L · 65.2% of games
4.5
55.6%
40W–32L · 50.9% of games
8.0
75%
3W–1L · 62% of games
8.5
40%
2W–3L · 46.5% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
89.6%
43W–5L · 66.2% of games
9.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
122 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
80 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
40 matches
#1 Singles
6%
16 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal