← Search

Eileen Hotze

Lenexa, KS
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
223 matches · 118W–105L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Eileen Hotze to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history223 matches
L
2026-09-13 · McDermed, Angie · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Veronica Legaz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-19 · Chiao, Denise · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lori Blinn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-31 · Burgess, Randy · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jerry Martin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-29 · Chiao, Denise · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Shauntae Morris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-29 · Burgess, Randy · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jerry Martin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-20 · Robinson, Michelle · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Bomhoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-18 · Mcdermed, Angie · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Menghini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-1
L
2026-05-15 · Burgess, Randy · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nate Anderson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-05-11 · Mcdermed, Angie · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lori Blinn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-05-08 · Burgess, Randy · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Mathy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-04-29 · Robinson, Michelle · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Blinn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-22 · Robinson, Michelle · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Curtis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams61 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
43.8%
7W–9L · 45.9% of games
3.0
84.6%
11W–2L · 58.6% of games
3.5
59.9%
85W–57L · 53.6% of games
4.0
21.6%
8W–29L · 37.9% of games
7.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 54.9% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 40% of the time
#3 Doubles
40%
88 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
84 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
49 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe