← Search

Eric Sanders

Chicago, IL
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
59 matches · 31W–28L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Eric Sanders to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history59 matches
L
2026-08-01 · CDTA S 55&OM7.0 1.MTC Brown Sat 7 $33.5 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mil Ovan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-27 · CDTA S 55&OM6.0 1.Wilm Mesh-1 Sat 11 $20 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-13 · CDTA S 55&OM6.0 1.Wilm Mesh-1 Sat 11 $20 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeff Siegel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2024-11-09 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott Williamson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2023-12-02 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Don Duszynski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2023-11-18 · CDTA E 40&OM3.0 3.Centennial Siegel Sat 7 $20 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ripley Worthy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2023-07-22 · CDTA S 55&OM7.0 b.MT Chi Brown Sat 6 $28 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Compton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2023-07-15 · CDTA S 18&OM3.0 a.MT Chi Brown Sat 3 $28 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2023-05-20 · CDTA S 18&OM3.0 a.MT Chi Brown Sat 3 $28 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kevin Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2023-03-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Randall Lehner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2023-03-11 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2023-01-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kevin Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
54.9%
28W–23L · 49.2% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
25%
1W–3L · 30.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
19 matches
#2 Singles
9%
5 matches
#1 Singles
7%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
4 matches
#3 Singles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe