← Search

Emily van Niel

— year-end
59 matches · 42W–17L · seasons 2019–2023

Captains: add Emily van Niel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history59 matches
L
2023-03-12 · Spravzoff/McCallum · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracy Schweitzer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2023-03-12 · Spravzoff/McCallum · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Becky Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
Holly Thompson / Rachel Camacho
2022-03-23 · 4.0 PAS LeWin W40S · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barbara Hess
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2022-02-13 · Spravzoff/McCallum · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Bates
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L
2022-02-13 · Spravzoff/McCallum · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jana Perpich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L
2022-02-02 · 4.0 PAS LeWin W40S · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barbara Hess
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
2022-01-05 · 4.0 PAS LeWin W40S · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barbara Hess
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2021-09-28 · 4.0 PAS LeWin W40F · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barbara Hess
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2021-09-08 · 4.0 PAS LeWin W40F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barbara Hess
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2020-02-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maryellen O'Keefe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2020-02-09 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Len van Niel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Tina Sacchi / Elizabeth Smith
2020-02-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Holm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
Teams4 teams · 2022–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
83.3%
35W–7L · 64.6% of games
4.0
38.5%
5W–8L · 45.7% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
18 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert