← Search

Cindy Steward

Champaign, IL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
45 matches · 29W–16L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Cindy Steward to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history45 matches
L
2026-07-07 · MSIL A18&O 3.5W Tennant-Champaign · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Armstrong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-30 · MSIL A18&O 3.5W Tennant-Champaign · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bridget Melton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-26 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julia Sheketoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-22 · MSIL A18&O 3.5W Tennant-Champaign · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hillary Tennant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Colleen Manno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Knight
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-08-02 · #1 Doubles · with Shelley Siuts championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-06-10 · MSIL A40&O 3.0W Yun-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Weldon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2025-06-03 · MSIL A40&O 3.0W Yun-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shelley Siuts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-05-13 · MSIL A40&O 3.0W Yun-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shelley Siuts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-05-06 · MSIL A40&O 3.0W Yun-Champaign · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Maloney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
74.1%
20W–7L · 60.7% of games
3.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 37.3% of games
5.5
100%
5W–0L · 62.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
6 matches
#1 Singles
9%
4 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer