← Search

Ashley Chelednik

Alpharetta, GA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
92 matches · 71W–21L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Ashley Chelednik to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history92 matches
W
2026-08-29 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jacqueline Henley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-22 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Libby Barbosa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cathy Niemi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
Michele McBride / Kelly Richardson
2026-06-04 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Emily Ruthven
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-05-31 · The Manor (Sandra Galvis)* · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Libby Barbosa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 6-3
L
2026-05-28 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Angela Wredberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-14 · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cathy Niemi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 2-6
W
2026-04-19 · The Manor (Amy Amick)* · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Allyson Stabner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-03-25 · The Manor (Amy Amick)* · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Allyson Stabner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-14 · The Manor (Amy Amick)* · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Libby Barbosa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-01-17 · The Manor (Sandra Galvis)* · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Libby Barbosa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-16 · The Manor (Sandra Galvis)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kasey Griffin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
100%
4W–0L · 83.1% of games
3.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 70.8% of games
3.5
80.6%
25W–6L · 66.1% of games
4.0
86.4%
19W–3L · 64.4% of games
4.5
62.1%
18W–11L · 53.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 38% of the time
#1 Singles
38%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
12 matches
#2 Singles
5%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams