← Search

Craig Cooke

OLD SAYBROOK, CT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
87 matches · 55W–32L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Craig Cooke to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history87 matches
L
2026-05-31 · OSB: Slackers: Noniewicz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christopher Garvey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-16 · OSB: Slackers: Noniewicz · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-02 · OSB: Slackers: Noniewicz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Fiocco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-04-19 · OSB: Slackers: Noniewicz · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-04-19 · OSB: Sobolewski/Peterson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Dunn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-04-12 · OSB: Slackers: Noniewicz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paul Noniewicz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-03-14 · OSRC:Slackers:Noniewicz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Gage
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-01 · OSB: Sobolewski/Peterson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ben Citrin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-02-22 · OSRC:Sobolewski 4.0 Men's: Sobolewski/Peterson · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-08 · OSRC:Slackers:Noniewicz · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-01 · OSRC:Slackers:Noniewicz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paul Noniewicz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-01-17 · OSRC:Slackers:Noniewicz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Rubinstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
69.1%
47W–21L · 54.9% of games
4.0
42.1%
8W–11L · 44.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
34 matches
#1 Singles
31%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer