Susan DiMagno
165 matches · 99W–66L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Susan DiMagno to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history165 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
N/A
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-5, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
Teams46 teams · 2022–2027
CHI E 18W4.5 4.Score Ezike Sun 3 $25
CHI E 40W4.5 1.Tam Jurczyk Sat 1 $25
NITA E 90W55a Vaughan-McTeague/McClure
CDTA E 18&OW4.5 6Score Kamel Sun 1 $20
CDTA E 40&OW4.5 2Naper Blaauw Sat 4 $24
CDTA E 55&OW9.0 1Naper DeMari Sat 4 $24
CDTA S 18&OW4.5 1.Score Kamel Sat 11 $20
CDTA S 40&OW4.5 3.Tam Jurczyk Wed 7 $22
CDTA W 18&OW4.5 1.Score Kamel Sun 1 $20
CDTA W 40&OW4.5 2.Naper Blaauw Sat 4 $24
CDTA W 55&OW9.0 1.Naper DeMari Sat 4 $24
NITA S 75WCb Homewood-Young/Anderson
NITA S 85CWb Vaughan-McClure/McTeague
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 50.3% of games
4.5
59.6%
62W–42L · 53.4% of games
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
55.2%
16W–13L · 48.6% of games
9.0
100%
7W–0L · 61.2% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 57% of the time
#1 Doubles
57%
94 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
22 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.