← Search

Glenda Boeker

Mountain View, CA
5.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
41 matches · 16W–25L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Glenda Boeker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history41 matches
L
2026-07-07 · Sokol/Sangwan · #1 Singles · 5.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Crissianne Kintanar championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Sophia Kryloff championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · with Sophia Kryloff championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-15 · Sokol/Sangwan · #1 Singles · 5.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-30 · Metro: Kelly/Ceccaldi · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Isabella Hartman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-16 · Sokol/Sangwan · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Madison Stevens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-11 · #2 Doubles · 10.0 · with Teppei Suzuki mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-29 · Sokol/Sangwan · #1 Singles · 5.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-28 · #3 Doubles · 10.0 · with Patrick Knise mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-21 · #1 Doubles · 10.0 · with Erik Rauch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-18 · Metro: Kelly/Ceccaldi · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Lena Arafa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
25%
1W–3L · 45.8% of games
4.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 37.5% of games
10.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 38.9% of games
9.0mixed
50%
7W–7L · 52.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
14 matches
#1 Singles
17%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
7 matches
#2 Singles
15%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert