← Search

Edward Andrewes

Haddonfield, NJ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
100 matches · 65W–35L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Edward Andrewes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history100 matches
W
2026-08-04 · Downs The Line · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with William Downs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-08-02 · NJD/Green Valley · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marc Oberholtzer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-02 · NJD/Green Valley · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Theodore Massaro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
Andrea Chu / Johann Lim
2026-05-17 · #2 Doubles · with Deb Williams championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-03 · Court Kings · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Graflage
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
Lisa Dennison / Lee Dennison
2026-03-28 · Mixed, Not Stirred · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deb Williams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-07-13 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ray Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-05-04 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Kober
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2025-03-08 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Emily Andrewes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
John Pagano / Gary Goldman
2024-08-11 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with William Downs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2024-08-10 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mike Buckley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
Kenneth Leese / Kevin Knapp
2024-07-02 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jerome Napson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
68%
17W–8L · 55.5% of games
4.0
75%
6W–2L · 58% of games
7.0
85.7%
12W–2L · 66.7% of games
8.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 57.6% of games
7.0mixed
54.5%
18W–15L · 52.9% of games
8.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 48.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
18 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert