← Search

Fallon Laforge

Providence, RI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
167 matches · 120W–47L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Fallon Laforge to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history167 matches
W
2026-07-16 · LAK:SHS:Kimball · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindsay Wands
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-3
W
2026-07-14 · LAK:SHS:Kimball · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zoe Kelliher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-13 · EB: O'Keefe · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mari Bianco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-29 · EB: O'Keefe · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alice Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 6-3
W
2026-06-25 · LAK:SHS:Kimball · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zoe Kelliher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-24 · A RP: Leite/Mello · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Buck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-20 · A RP: Leite/Mello · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Leite
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-11 · LAK:SHS:Kimball · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindsay Wands
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-10 · A RP: Leite/Mello · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Buck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-06-07 · A RP: Leite/Mello · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 6-2
W
2026-06-05 · EB: O'Keefe · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erica Botelho
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-05-28 · EB: O'Keefe · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
69.1%
65W–29L · 56.6% of games
4.0
60%
9W–6L · 52.5% of games
6.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 59.1% of games
7.0mixed
74.1%
20W–7L · 56.5% of games
8.0mixed
89.5%
17W–2L · 60.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
94 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
29 matches
#2 Singles
4%
6 matches
#1 Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer