← Search

Purvi Patel

— year-end
70 matches · 39W–31L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Purvi Patel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history70 matches
W
2026-09-11 · DED:Dedham:Nguyen · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Seth Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-07-14 · W109:Lady Knights:Broderick/Alcorn · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Broderick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-09 · W109:Racq Pack:Broderick/Patel · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-06 · DED:Dedham:Giannetti · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wenping Xu Quinn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-30 · W109:Lady Knights:Broderick/Alcorn · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elisabeth Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-29 · DED:Dedham:Giannetti · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with CHI NGUYEN
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-25 · W109:Racq Pack:Broderick/Patel · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine Yantosca
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-5
L
2026-06-23 · W109:Lady Knights:Broderick/Alcorn · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Veronica Garzone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-5, 0-1
W
2026-06-18 · W109:Racq Pack:Broderick/Patel · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-09 · W109:Lady Knights:Broderick/Alcorn · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Iris Kramer-Alcorn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-26 · W109:Lady Knights:Broderick/Alcorn · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meredith Murphy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-05-21 · W109:Racq Pack:Broderick/Patel · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
Teams16 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 56% of games
3.5
51.2%
22W–21L · 52.9% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
71.4%
10W–4L · 61.3% of games
8.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 43.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
10 matches
#2 Singles
7%
5 matches
#1 Singles
6%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert