← Search

Lisa Marquart

Edmonds, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
112 matches · 55W–57L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Lisa Marquart to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history112 matches
L
2025-04-22 · Lisa Marquart · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-6
L
2025-04-03 · HBSQ-Pearl Slam-Arrigoni · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vivian Olson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2025-03-27 · HBSQ-Pearl Slam-Arrigoni · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abigail Stansfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-03-18 · Lisa Marquart · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2024-11-26 · Marquart (Flexible) · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2024-11-16 · HBSQ-Lane · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Vijay Sankaran mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L
Wan Kang / Hyemin Jeon
2024-11-10 · HBSQ-Lane · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Forrest Carlson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2024-11-03 · Marquart (Flexible) · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2024-11-03 · HBSQ-Lane · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stanley Cernosek mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 5-7
L
2024-10-25 · HBSQ-Lane · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matt Gerrans mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2024-10-19 · HBSQ-Lane · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matt Gerrans mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2024-10-12 · HBSQ-Lane · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matt Gerrans mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2021–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
74.2%
23W–8L · 61.2% of games
3.5
43.6%
17W–22L · 50.2% of games
6.0mixed
58.8%
10W–7L · 54.5% of games
7.0mixed
10.5%
2W–17L · 37.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 35% of the time
#1 Singles
35%
39 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
14 matches
#2 Singles
12%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer