← Search

Edgar Crescencio

Walnut Creek, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
27 matches · 18W–9L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Edgar Crescencio to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history27 matches
W
2026-08-29 · PINOLE PK 55MX7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maggie Celestini mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-08 · PINOLE PK 40MX7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lourdes Alano mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-01 · PINOLE PK 40MX7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maggie Celestini mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-07-26 · PINOLE PK 40MX7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lourdes Alano mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-19 · PINOLE PK 40MX7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anita Lifson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-03 · BENICIA TA/BENICIA HS 55AM8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mike Connerley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-05-02 · BENICIA TA/BENICIA HS 55AM8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dennis Ciriaco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-25 · BENICIA TA/BENICIA HS 55AM8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Henry Cruz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-18 · BENICIA TA/BENICIA HS 55AM8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jesse Gonzalez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-03-28 · BENICIA TA/BENICIA HS 55AM8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gary Gem Yanez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-15 · WILLOW PASS PK 40AM4.0A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Henry Cruz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-07 · PINOLE PK 18MX7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anita Lifson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 65.2% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
40%
2W–3L · 48.1% of games
7.0mixed
75%
9W–3L · 52.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
37%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova