← Search

Jill Braendle

Rockford, MI
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
80 matches · 73W–7L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jill Braendle to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history80 matches
W
2026-05-30 · MVH Haskill WSL A18-4.5WW · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Gerling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-16 · MVH Haskill WSL A18-4.5WW · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gabrielle Giertz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-03-29 · MVH Bender WSL M40-9.0X · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ben Lassanske mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-03-28 · MVH Bender WSL A40-4.5WW · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nancy Dancz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
N/A
2026-03-13 · MVH Bos WSL A55-9.0WW · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Becky Musgraves
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-03-03 · MVC Williams WSL C18-8.5W · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Irina Leyfman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-02-28 · MVH Bender WSL A40-4.5WW · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kelly Haskill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-02-27 · MVH Bos WSL A55-9.0WW · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Nancy Dancz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-02-24 · MVC Williams WSL C18-8.5W · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Beth Post
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-02-15 · MVH Bender WSL M40-9.0X · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ben Lassanske mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-02-14 · MVH Bender WSL A40-4.5WW · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Beth Post
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-09-09 · MVC Williams FWL C18-8.5W · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sarah Williams
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
91.4%
32W–3L · 67.5% of games
8.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 75.9% of games
9.0
100%
4W–0L · 76.2% of games
8.0mixed
100%
7W–0L · 76.1% of games
9.0mixed
88.9%
16W–2L · 68.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 69% of the time
#1 Doubles
69%
55 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer