← Search

Walt Crate

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
84 matches · 55W–29L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Walt Crate to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history84 matches
L
2026-08-04 · Cronn/Crate · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Cronn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-15 · Cronn/Crate · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Cronn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-12-05 · MAC-Turnbull/McDonagh · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian Posewitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
2025-10-25 · MAC-Turnbull/McDonagh · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian McDonagh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-09-27 · MAC-Turnbull/McDonagh · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Torch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2025-08-16 · #1 Doubles · with Jeff Cronn championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2025-07-28 · Cronn/Crate · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Cronn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-07-27 · MAC-Landers · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Laura Luthi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-07-25 · Cronn/Crate · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Cronn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-07-07 · Cronn/Crate · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Cronn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
L
2025-06-30 · MAC-Landers · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elisa Landers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
2023-05-27 · N OR-MAC-Herbst · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ben Jacobson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
81.8%
18W–4L · 66.5% of games
4.0
53.8%
7W–6L · 49.6% of games
8.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
65.4%
17W–9L · 54.8% of games
8.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 52.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams