← Search

Courtney Andreach

HIXSON, TN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
43 matches · 24W–19L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Courtney Andreach to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history43 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Andreach-Simmons/Chattanooga · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Hammargren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
W
2026-07-27 · Sorrow · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kate Rolen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-06 · Sorrow · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kelley Finnell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-17 · Andreach-Simmons/Chattanooga · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paige Mathis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-02 · Andreach-Simmons/Chattanooga · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leslie Simmons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-04-04 · Andreach-Simmons/Chattanooga · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley Soni
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-03-30 · Sorrow · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Heather Tuttle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-03-23 · Sorrow · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Leslie Simmons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-03-21 · Andreach-Simmons/Chattanooga · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2025-12-02 · Sorrow · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jazan Powell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-11-18 · Sorrow · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Raquel Riesco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2025-09-22 · Skinner · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kimberly Rogg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
75%
3W–1L · 47.8% of games
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
57.7%
15W–11L · 51% of games
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 37% of games
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
40%
2W–3L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
11 matches
#3 Female Doubles
9%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer