← Search

Erin Lea

Seattle, WA
4.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
141 matches · 81W–60L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Erin Lea to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history141 matches
L
2026-08-05 · TEEM (Flexible) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Davidson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-04 · TEEM (Flexible) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tina L Garcia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-07-20 · TEEM (Flexible) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tina L Garcia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-30 · STC-Blakeslee · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caroline Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-05-03 · STC-Blakeslee · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Seeley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-02 · STC-Blakeslee · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caroline Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-05-01 · STC-Blakeslee · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caroline Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-17 · STC-Blakeslee · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Courtney Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-02-14 · STC-Mitchell · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie McReynolds
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-01-31 · STC-Mitchell · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-01-09 · STC-Mitchell · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeannie Trautmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-01-04 · STC-Mitchell · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 66.7% of games
3.0
63.6%
14W–8L · 54.8% of games
3.5
74.1%
20W–7L · 59.3% of games
4.0
45.5%
25W–30L · 47.5% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
57.9%
11W–8L · 53.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
64 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
34 matches
#1 Singles
16%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
14 matches
#2 Singles
5%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe