← Search

Diana Stroble

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
74 matches · 46W–28L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Diana Stroble to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history74 matches
W
2026-05-15 · STC-Rodden · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brigid Britton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-08 · STC-Rodden · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brigid Britton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-10 · STC-Rodden · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brigid Britton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-27 · STC-Rodden · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Davidson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-03-14 · STC-Rodden · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Davidson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-03-06 · STC-Rodden · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Davidson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-03-01 · STC-Rodden · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Davidson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-02-22 · STC-Rodden · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Skotdal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-01-25 · STC-Rodden · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tina L Garcia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W
2025-05-16 · STC-Garcia Later! · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Scalzo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-05-15 · STC-Garcia Later! · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Scalzo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-05-09 · STC-Garcia Later! · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
77.8%
7W–2L · 68.4% of games
3.5
80%
24W–6L · 65.5% of games
4.0
39.3%
11W–17L · 45.8% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 54.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
12 matches
#1 Singles
8%
6 matches
#2 Singles
7%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova