← Search

Hanna Hulbert

Waynesville, OH
2.5A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
61 matches · 34W–27L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Hanna Hulbert to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history61 matches
L
2026-06-27 · SRTC-Holbrook · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Holbrook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-13 · SRTC-Holbrook · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicole Armitage
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-08 · SRTC-Holbrook · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lois Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-03 · SRTC-Forster · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jane Woodford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-15 · SRTC-Holbrook · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lois Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-01 · SRTC-Holbrook · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tracy Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-02-22 · SRTC-Forster · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
Melissa Conrad / Sarah Gillis
2026-02-20 · SRTC-Holbrook · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Arshia Myers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
Kristin Nielsen / Jasmine Davies
2025-12-20 · SRTC Forster · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Beth Salama
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-11-23 · SRTC Forster · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jane Woodford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-11-22 · SRTC Fahrenholz · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca Cobb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-11-09 · SRTC Forster · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Liz Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
56.8%
21W–16L · 52.2% of games
3.0
66.7%
8W–4L · 59.8% of games
5.5
75%
3W–1L · 52.2% of games
6.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 42.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
20 matches
#1 Singles
16%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer