← Search

Fernando Furquim

Minneapolis, MN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
23 matches · 12W–11L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Fernando Furquim to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history23 matches
L
2026-07-24 · Hebner Summer 2026 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Rich mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-05 · Hebner Summer 2026 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sara Tetrick mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-29 · Hebner Summer 2026 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sara Tetrick mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-03-09 · Anderson · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-16 · Anderson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anthony Brooks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-01-26 · Anderson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Mercer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-01-05 · Anderson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anthony Brooks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-12-22 · Fanelli: The Drop Bears · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brandon Kemboi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-12-11 · Fanelli: The Drop Bears · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Ring
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-12-04 · Fanelli: The Drop Bears · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Fanelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-11-20 · Fanelli: The Drop Bears · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paul Hoffmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-10-23 · Fanelli: The Drop Bears · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Eli Kramer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
64.3%
9W–5L · 59.6% of games
3.5
25%
1W–3L · 43.8% of games
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 46% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
4 matches
#2 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams