← Search

Rick Haskell

Charlotte, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
97 matches · 47W–50L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Rick Haskell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history97 matches
L
2026-09-10 · TFarley (Park Crossing) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ian Dabrowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-27 · TFarley (Park Crossing) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Matt McNealy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-25 · TFarley (Park Crossing) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ian Dabrowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-20 · TFarley (Park Crossing) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ian Dabrowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-10 · MMerkel (Park Crossing) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with John Moritz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-06 · TFarley (Park Crossing) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ian Dabrowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-08-03 · MMerkel (Park Crossing) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Robert Sledd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-07-22 · MMerkel (Park Crossing) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt McNealy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-08 · MMerkel (Park Crossing) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt McNealy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-17 · MMerkel (Park Crossing) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ian Dabrowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-06-03 · MMerkel (Park Crossing) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Trey Farley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-20 · TFarley (Park Crossing) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ian Dabrowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
46%
23W–27L · 50.4% of games
6.5
54.8%
17W–14L · 53.7% of games
7.5
30%
3W–7L · 43.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 57% of the time
#2 Doubles
57%
55 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
18 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe