← Search

Adam Barr

HENDERSON, NV
5.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
126 matches · 77W–49L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Adam Barr to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history126 matches
W
2026-05-15 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Chloe Dilling mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-04-01 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lindsey Lanni mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-03-27 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Ianmarco Millet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-12-13 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with James Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-12-06 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mathew Dees
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2025-11-29 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Adrian Selby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2025-10-04 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mathew Dees
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2025-09-20 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Adrian Selby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-08-14 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mathew Dees
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
Chrys Castro-Vargas / Brian Allen
2025-07-31 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nathaniel Yost
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-07-17 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher Carron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-05-30 · DRAGONRIDGE CC #1 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with MJ Hannon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
4.5
69.5%
66W–29L · 58.3% of games
5.0
18.2%
2W–9L · 36.4% of games
8.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 50% of games
9.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 55.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 40% of the time
#1 Singles
40%
50 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
15 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova