Haina Shin
DEERFIELD, IL
423 matches · 291W–132L · seasons 2020–2026
Captains: add Haina Shin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history423 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
Erica White / Michelle Parks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams134 teams · 2020–2027
CHI E 18W4.0 6.Tam Lund Sat 3 $25
CHI E 18W4.5 1.Wilm Burns Sun 3 $20
CHI E 40W4.0 1.Tam Lund Sun 1 $25
CHI E 40W4.5 1.Tam Jurczyk Sat 1 $25
CHI E M18.8.0 3.CPE Sitar Fri 7:30 $28
NITA E 40W18e Wilmette-Farinas/Nakamura
NITA E 40W40a Wilmette-Jurczyk/Dau
CDTA E 18&OW4.0 2Tam Lund Sat 3 $22
CDTA E 40&OW4.5 3Tam Jurczyk Sat 1 $22
CDTA E M18&O8.0 3CPE Sitar Fri 7:30 $28
CDTA S 18&OW4.0 1.Tam Lund Tue 7 $22
CDTA S 18&OW4.5 2.Wilm Burns Sun 3 $20
CDTA S 40&OW4.0 2.Tam Lund Thu 7 $22
CDTA S 40&OW4.5 3.Tam Jurczyk Wed 7 $22
CDTA S ComboW6.5 3.Nbk Shin Sat 10 $28
CDTA S ComboW7.5 3.Gnvw Sangal Mon 7 $21
CDTA S ComboW8.5 3.RCLB Cal Wed 7 $22
CDTA S ComboX7.5 8.McFet Baltazar Sun 3 $25
CDTA S M18&O8.0 2.CPE Sitar Fri 7 $28
CDTA S TriWLo 7.Gnvw Baltazar Tue 7 $21
CDTA S TriWMid 8.Gnvw Baltazar Tue 7 $21
CDTA W 18&OW4.0 4.Tam Lund Sat 3 $22
CDTA W 40&OW4.0 5.Tam Lund Sun 1 $22
CDTA W 40&OW4.5 3.Tam Jurczyk Sat 1 $22
CDTA W ComboW6.5 3.Gnvw Shin Sun 3 $21
CDTA W ComboW7.5 1.Gnvw Sangal Sun 5 $21
CDTA W ComboW8.5 3.RCLB Cal Sat 4 $22
CDTA W M18&O8.0 6.CPE Sitar Fri 7:30 $28
CDTA W TriWHi 2.STP Wright Sat 3 $22
CDTA W TriWLo 5.Gnvw Baltazar Sat 3 $21
CDTA W TriWMid 3.Gnvw Baltazaar Sat 3 $21
CHI F CW6.5 4.Gnvw Shin Sun 3 $21
NITA E 40W18a TAM-Jurczyk/Wright
NITA E 40W40a Wilmette Tennis-Jurczyk/Wright
NITA S 40W18e TAM-Jurczyk/Farinas
NITA S 40W40d Wilmette-Jurczyk/Farinas
NITA W 40W18a TAM-Jurczyk/Farinas
NITA W 40W40b Wilmette-Jurczyk/Farinas
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
50%
6W–6L · 50.4% of games
3.5
87.5%
49W–7L · 65.4% of games
4.0
75.6%
136W–44L · 62.1% of games
4.5
52.4%
11W–10L · 54.3% of games
6.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 40.5% of games
7.5
60%
3W–2L · 55.2% of games
8.5
70.8%
17W–7L · 64% of games
9.0
0%
0W–4L · 41.9% of games
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 74.1% of games
7.5mixed
72%
18W–7L · 56.4% of games
8.0mixed
65.2%
30W–16L · 56.3% of games
8.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Singles, 26% of the time
#1 Singles
26%
110 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
101 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
97 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
78 matches
#2 Singles
8%
35 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.