← Search

Inese Williamson

Silver Spring, MD
5.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
210 matches · 148W–62L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Inese Williamson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history210 matches
W
2026-09-03 · Feldman - Ace Kickers · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Joshua Zoltek mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-15 · Feldman - Ace Kickers · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Joshua Zoltek mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-30 · Feldman - Ace Kickers · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Geoffrey Montgomery mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-29 · Sipocz · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Kaitlyn Heo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-26 · Sipocz · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Amanda Studnicki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-15 · Sipocz · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Helena Sokolova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-06-14 · Sipocz · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Helena Sokolova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-07 · Jakubik · #1 Singles · 5.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-02 · Feldman - Double the Fun · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Brent Kendall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-26 · Feldman - Double the Fun · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Brent Kendall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-18 · Feldman - Double the Fun · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Joshua Zoltek mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-17 · Jakubik · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Kendall Heitzner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams66 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
0.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5
100%
10W–0L · 74.8% of games
5.0
42.9%
6W–8L · 55.5% of games
9.5
100%
6W–0L · 74.2% of games
0.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 55% of games
10.0mixed
80%
8W–2L · 64% of games
3.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 46.8% of games
5.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 52.4% of games
8.0mixed
90.9%
10W–1L · 61.4% of games
8.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 61.3% of games
9.0mixed
64.8%
46W–25L · 55.7% of games
9.5mixed
57.1%
16W–12L · 54.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
91 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
63 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
40 matches
#1 Singles
6%
12 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert