← Search

Andrew Zima

Midlothian, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
175 matches · 82W–93L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Andrew Zima to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history175 matches
W
2026-09-01 · Avalon Ghita · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Owen Alberti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-30 · 7.5 Combo at the Bury - Stembridge · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dan Stembridge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-19 · Avalon Ghita · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Josh Reynal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-08-13 · Avalon Ghita · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Josh Reynal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-11 · Avalon Ghita · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Owen Alberti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-08 · 7.5 Combo at the Bury - Stembridge · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dan Stembridge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-07-28 · Magnolia Green Hold My Racquet - Sebetic · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alex Abbott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-07-25 · Magnolia Green Hold My Racquet - Sebetic · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Juan Loza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-24 · Avalon Ghita 7.0 Mix 40 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ashley Houghtaling mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · with Jeff Kane championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-07-17 · #2 Doubles · with James Holland championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-15 · Avalon Ghita 7.0 Mix 40 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ashley Houghtaling mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams89 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
4.0
54.9%
28W–23L · 51.2% of games
4.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 35.1% of games
7.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 42% of games
8.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 40.7% of games
4.0mixed
20%
3W–12L · 44.9% of games
6.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 58.8% of games
7.0mixed
87%
20W–3L · 64% of games
7.5mixed
56.2%
9W–7L · 57% of games
8.0mixed
35%
7W–13L · 44.6% of games
8.5mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 38.8% of games
9.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 43.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
70 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
53 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
50 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova