← Search

MaryBeth Giles

— year-end
115 matches · 75W–40L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add MaryBeth Giles to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history115 matches
W
2026-05-30 · OSB: Diamond Dogs II: Libert · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn Katz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-6
W
2026-04-25 · OSB: Diamond Dogs II: Libert · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eileen Duggan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-03-22 · OSB: Diamond Dogs II: Libert · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn Katz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-28 · OSB: Diamond Dogs II: Libert · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alexandra Bates
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-13 · OSRC:Katz/Giles · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthias Podzuhn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-01-31 · OSRC:Diamond Dogs:Trausch/Degrooth · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn Katz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-01-10 · OSRC:Diamond Dogs:Trausch/Degrooth · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Grace Degrooth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-5
W
2025-12-06 · OSRC:Diamond Dogs:Trausch/Degrooth · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eileen Duggan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
L
2025-11-21 · OSRC:Katz/Giles · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Noniewicz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-06-15 · OSRC: Katz/Giles · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Bubello mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-05-18 · OSRC: Katz/Giles · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with George Brooks mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
L
2025-04-12 · OSRC:40&:Libert · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn Katz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
Teams34 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
90.5%
19W–2L · 67.5% of games
3.5
62.8%
27W–16L · 53.9% of games
6.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
75%
6W–2L · 60% of games
6.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 56.6% of games
7.0mixed
47.1%
16W–18L · 51.4% of games
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
31 matches
#1 Singles
22%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
20 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova