← Search

Cecil Sunder

Broomfield, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
57 matches · 27W–30L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Cecil Sunder to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history57 matches
L
Zack Masciopinto
2025-09-03 · RCC GREEN · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2025-08-13 · RCC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bryan Cobb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-08-06 · RCC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bryan Cobb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-07-23 · RCC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bryan Cobb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2023-08-01 · RCC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bryan Cobb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-3
W
2023-07-25 · RCC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bryan Cobb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
Jeffrey Johnson / Paul Raver
2023-07-23 · RCC RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Conrad Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-7, 1-0
L
John Reenan / Kevin Edwards
2023-06-07 · RCC RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bryan Cobb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2023-05-24 · RCC RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Conrad Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2023-04-26 · RCC RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sam Getlan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2023-04-19 · RCC RED · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2022-08-16 · RCC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bryan Cobb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2020–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
47.6%
20W–22L · 49.8% of games
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 47.7% of games
7.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 52.7% of games
8.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 50.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
19 matches
#1 Singles
28%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
8 matches
#2 Singles
11%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer