← Search

Amy DiFiore

Danbury, CT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
126 matches · 60W–66L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Amy DiFiore to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history126 matches
L
2026-07-20 · #3 Doubles · with Kathy Blenk championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
Erika Jaeger / Jennifer Murphy
2026-07-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Blenk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-07-08 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marlena Simmons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marlena Simmons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Blenk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-06-04 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Chiappardi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-2
W
2026-05-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Chiappardi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-05-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Blenk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-02 · KH: New Ads: Gaillard/Connelly · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Chiappardi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-29 · WTC: Triple Threat · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Paxton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-02-28 · WTC: Triple Threat · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Blenk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
Maria Sanchez / Elizabeth Laitman
2026-02-06 · WTC: Triple Threat · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Blenk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
53.1%
43W–38L · 51.2% of games
4.0
36.1%
13W–23L · 41.8% of games
7.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 51% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
30 matches
#2 Singles
6%
7 matches
#1 Singles
5%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer