← Search

Laurel Hallock Koppelman

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
152 matches · 75W–77L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Laurel Hallock Koppelman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history152 matches
W
2026-09-12 · IRV-Koppelman · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lech Kaiel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-09 · IRV-Koppelman/Kuerbis · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lech Kaiel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-04 · Love Actually · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sanam Dowlatdad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-25 · IRV-Koppelman/Kuerbis · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joshua Lewis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-25 · Love Actually · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nozomi Bray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-06 · IRV-Hallock Koppelman/Cooke · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sanam Dowlatdad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-30 · ET-Tanca · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lucia Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-17 · IRV-Hallock Koppelman/Cooke · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sanam Dowlatdad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-05-09 · IRV-Hallock Koppelman/Cooke · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sanam Dowlatdad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-05-01 · ET-Tanca · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lucia Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-04-19 · IRV-Hallock Koppelman/Cooke · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kate Sullivan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-04-17 · ET-Tanca · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Dwiggins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2018–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 60.6% of games
3.0
49.3%
34W–35L · 47.7% of games
3.5
14.3%
2W–12L · 36.1% of games
6.0mixed
50%
19W–19L · 46.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
36 matches
#1 Singles
10%
15 matches
#2 Singles
4%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova