← Search

Manoj Nagalla

— year-end
53 matches · 27W–26L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Manoj Nagalla to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history53 matches
L
2026-09-03 · 3.5 CTC2 GRINDERS M18F · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Olshefski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
Patrick Smith / Steve Meihaus
2026-08-31 · 3.5 CTC2 UNITED M40F · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aanandraj Jhaveri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-08-04 · 7.5 CTC GRINDERS MTues · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brennan Begay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-15 · 7.5 CTC GRINDERS MTues · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Aanandraj Jhaveri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-09 · 7.5 CTC GRINDERS MTues · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sumit Bahadur
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-30 · 7.5 CTC GRINDERS MTues · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Bowen Pan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-06-09 · 7.5 CTC GRINDERS MTues · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Marco Campos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
Howard Pena / Kevin Taylor
2026-04-02 · 3.5 CTC GRINDERS M18S · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anthony Hubbard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-03-05 · 3.5 CTC GRINDERS M18S · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aanandraj Jhaveri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-19 · 3.5 CTC GRINDERS M18S · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-02-12 · 3.5 CTC GRINDERS M18S · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-01-27 · 3.5 CTC GRINDERS M18S · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Teams8 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
50%
24W–24L · 49.1% of games
7.5
60%
3W–2L · 61.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 25% of the time
#1 Singles
25%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
12 matches
#2 Singles
15%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe