← Search

Amy Matteucci

— year-end
83 matches · 26W–57L · seasons 2019–2023

Captains: add Amy Matteucci to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history83 matches
L
2022-11-12 · 4.0W Tanoan-Youngberg · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Eker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2022-10-30 · 4.0W Tanoan-Youngberg · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Schunk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2022-10-27 · 4.0W Tanoan-Youngberg · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Schunk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2022-10-18 · 4.0W Tanoan-Youngberg · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Monette Sedberry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2022-10-15 · 4.0W Tanoan-Youngberg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joan Yourick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2022-05-15 · NNM 4.0W Tanoan - Youngberg · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Schunk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2022-05-06 · NNM 4.0W Tanoan - Youngberg · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2022-04-30 · NNM 4.0W Tanoan - Youngberg · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2022-04-24 · NNM 3.5W Tanoan - Sedberry · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2022-04-09 · NNM 3.5W Tanoan - Sedberry · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurel Worth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2022-04-02 · NNM 3.5W Tanoan - Sedberry · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurel Worth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2022-03-26 · NNM 3.5W Tanoan - Sedberry · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindy Hernandez-Wall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
Teams9 teams · 2021–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
62.5%
15W–9L · 56.2% of games
3.5
19.4%
7W–29L · 37.6% of games
4.0
5.3%
1W–18L · 28.7% of games
6.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
27 matches
#1 Singles
25%
21 matches
#2 Singles
24%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
7%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer