← Search

Dawn Duhamel

Centennial, CO
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
64 matches · 26W–38L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Dawn Duhamel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
W
2026-07-13 · HV BLUE · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Linda Sjoberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-29 · HV BLUE · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dana Kershner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-08 · HV BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leslie Moody
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
Michelle Johnson / Maria Shea
2026-06-01 · HV BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leslie Clay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-28 · SS-H GREEN · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelli Douglass
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-27 · SS-H GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca Bontrager
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-14 · SS-H GREEN · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dana Kershner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-11 · SS-H GREEN · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alexandra Beltz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-04 · SS-H GREEN · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dana Kershner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-20 · SS-H GREEN · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alexandra Beltz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-13 · SS-H GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alexandra Beltz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2024-05-13 · HV SILVER · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Danielle Kennedy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
0.0
40%
2W–3L · 42.9% of games
2.5
44.8%
13W–16L · 48.8% of games
3.0
36.7%
11W–19L · 43.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
24 matches
#1 Singles
22%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
7 matches
#1 Female Doubles
8%
5 matches
#2 Singles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert