← Search

Heather Peschel

Horace, ND
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
23 matches · 15W–8L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Heather Peschel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history23 matches
L
2026-08-05 · Simply Smashing · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Shellenbarger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-15 · Simply Smashing · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jodi DePree
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
Nick Webb / Grace Wanzek
2026-07-14 · Mixed and Dangerous · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Pladson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-06-30 · Mixed and Dangerous · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Pladson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-26 · Simply Smashing · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Shellenbarger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-22 · Mixed and Dangerous · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with James LaFramboise mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
W
Jan Harris / Chriss Hixon
2026-06-18 · Hommeyer/Hulbert · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jodi DePree
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-11 · Hommeyer/Hulbert · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jodi DePree
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-06-08 · Mixed and Dangerous · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Pladson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-05-28 · Hommeyer/Hulbert · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Schultz-Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-09-02 · Shellenbarger: Simply Smashing · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Shellenbarger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-08-03 · Shellenbarger: Simply Smashing · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Shellenbarger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
64.3%
9W–5L · 56.8% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 54.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova