← Search

Dana Garner

Nichols Hills, OK
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
184 matches · 122W–62L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Dana Garner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history184 matches
L
2026-09-11 · Miss Hits · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Niki McClintock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
Lauren Schwartz Winzeler / Melissa Smith
2026-09-09 · Match Point Mamas · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Samantha Guffey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-09-02 · Match Point Mamas · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Samantha Guffey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-06-22 · Match Point Mamas · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathryn Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
Elizabeth McCrackin / Kelly Johnson
2026-06-09 · Match Point Mamas · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danielle Coats
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-01 · Match Point Mamas · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Lundquist
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-18 · Match Point Mamas · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Lundquist
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-07 · OKC Day/Miss Hits · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lee Anne Stone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-04 · Match Point Mamas · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Seda Bakir
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-01 · OKC Day/Miss Hits · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lee Anne Stone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-04-24 · OKC Day/Miss Hits · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lee Anne Stone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-20 · Match Point Mamas · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
56%
14W–11L · 52.3% of games
3.0
72.3%
47W–18L · 60.7% of games
3.5
64%
48W–27L · 54.4% of games
6.0
68.4%
13W–6L · 54.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
69 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
59 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
45 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
6 matches
#1 Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert