← Search

JoEllen Legg

INDIO, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
92 matches · 72W–20L · seasons 2019–2024

Captains: add JoEllen Legg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history92 matches
L
2024-12-15 · CV-Indian Wells TG/Simmons & Barnes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tammy Roach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2024-11-24 · CV-Indian Wells TG/Simmons & Barnes · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janneche Nevin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Nicole Parker / Suzette Emerson
2023-08-14 · DTC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kayla Hodges
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2023-08-07 · DTC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristin Bokelman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2023-07-31 · DTC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kayla Hodges
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2022-09-13 · DTC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leslie Greer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-1
W
2022-08-31 · GTC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deborah Alper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2022-08-29 · DTC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christian Hawley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L
2022-08-22 · DTC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Sipes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2022-08-10 · GTC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tammy Chamberlain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2022-08-08 · DTC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kayla Hodges
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2022-08-03 · GTC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tammy Chamberlain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
75%
3W–1L · 54.1% of games
2.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 52.2% of games
3.0
85.7%
24W–4L · 74.2% of games
3.5
68%
17W–8L · 57.2% of games
6.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 67.3% of games
7.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 62.5% of games
6.0mixed
100%
6W–0L · 76.3% of games
6.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
16 matches
#1 Female Doubles
4%
4 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert