← Search

Kathy Butkus

Sterling Heights, MI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
143 matches · 80W–63L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kathy Butkus to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history143 matches
W
2026-07-24 · PEACH-Swiderski 65S 7.0 DW · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peggy Offerle
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-21 · PEACH-Erfurt 55s 7.0 NW F1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Rea
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-10 · PEACH-Swiderski 65S 7.0 DW · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Esther Thomas
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-07 · PEACH-Erfurt 55s 7.0 NW F1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joanne Gaines
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-06 · EAST-Lukas 40s 3.0 DW F2 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Lukas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-12 · PEACH-Swiderski 65S 7.0 DW · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judith Swiderski
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-10 · PEACH-Erfurt 55s 7.0 NW F1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lori Paglini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-05 · PEACH-Swiderski 65S 7.0 DW · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judith Swiderski
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-03 · PEACH-Erfurt 55s 7.0 NW F1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristy Doherty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-29 · PEACH-Swiderski 65S 7.0 DW · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judith Swiderski
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L
Lisa Higgins / Christine Krause
2026-05-26 · PEACH-Erfurt 55s 7.0 NW F1 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristy Doherty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-18 · EAST-Lukas 40s 3.0 DW F2 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Fuller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
88.9%
8W–1L · 65.8% of games
6.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 51.9% of games
6.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 51.2% of games
7.0
54.9%
45W–37L · 52.7% of games
7.5
0%
0W–5L · 35.9% of games
6.0mixed
70%
7W–3L · 62.9% of games
7.0mixed
64.3%
9W–5L · 51.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
52 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
41 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer