← Search

Manish Nautiyal

— year-end
37 matches · 24W–13L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Manish Nautiyal to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history37 matches
W
2026-07-22 · MORGAN HILL TC/MORGAN HILL TC 40MX8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Campbell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-16 · MORGAN HILL TC/MORGAN HILL TC 40MX8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joma Ann Raniel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-16 · MORGAN HILL TC/MORGAN HILL TC 40MX8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Campbell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-13 · RIDGEMARK G&CC 18AM4.5A · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Zoheb Rayani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-13 · RIDGEMARK G&CC 18AM4.0A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mike Nichols
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-10 · RIDGEMARK G&CC 18AM4.0A · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-06 · RIDGEMARK G&CC 18AM4.5A · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Zoheb Rayani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-03 · RIDGEMARK G&CC 18AM4.0A · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-31 · RIDGEMARK G&CC 18AM4.0A · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-23 · RIDGEMARK G&CC 18AM4.0A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Doug Webenbauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
Alok Sanghavi / Rohit Sharma
2026-05-17 · RIDGEMARK G&CC 18AM4.0A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Doug Webenbauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-06 · RIDGEMARK G&CC 18AM4.0A · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
Teams36 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
65.2%
15W–8L · 53.6% of games
4.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 51.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
9 matches
#2 Singles
14%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer